Tell me the truth, doctor!
by Charles Lebaigue MD
You know, I taught medical psychology for 20 years to a lot of
medicine students. In fact since the very beginning of the
Antwerp Medical Faculty.
And all those years I tried to make my teaching language
each time clearer and more adequate to the topics I discussed
with my 21 years old students.
They were not more than 30 in the heroic beginning of the
University : almost boys. But in my last years, they were
Already more than 100 -- almost girls. Times do change.
I am sure you'll forgive me to have revealed something about
my own person before you take the challenge to follow me in
my more "philosophical" reflections.
If you are NOT so interested in such a "heavy" topics,
please * J U M P * straight to the END of next section:
==============================================
BUT.if you ARE, Fellow Heavy Thinkers, here we go!
==============================================
4. The Editor's view about Truth!
=============================================
What for a "truth" is the patient here above asking for?
What would SHE call The Truth in this case?
A plausible description of the development of her bad health
condition. An explanation she can believe and put up with.
But a "truth" her doctor also really can believe. And actually
does believe. In fact she asks for a "truth" they both believe
in and want to work with.
Is The Truth then nothing else than a suitable, from both
partners agreed tale? A story we now believe because
we trust each other TODAY ? Maybe we won't believe
"that truth" tomorrow any more. But another truth:
Our tomorrow's truth.
Truth - our truth - is like a living being: it has to be born,
To live a certain amount of time, to die and fully disappear.
Just as our Feelings do. Their existence is limited to the
duration of our actual relationship to a person or an object.
Do I assume then that there is no other Truth than such one?
Yes, I do. Truth is for me "social stuff". A kind of secret
between a "You" and a "Me".
And a secret "we" BOTH believe in.
For the present moment.
And this "You" has not to be a person of flesh and blood.
It can be God, the Bible, or even the Science, the Fate.
As long as I confirm "Your" existence for me by talking
to "You", by BELIEVING in "You".
Truth is thus a question of belief, of trust.
When the trust is over, the belief vanished? "Farewell Truth!"
Scientific Truth becomes "a remnant of a primitive stage of
Mankind". Do you remember the "childish" conception of
the old Ptolemy: the Earth as the centre of the Universe?
Even Religion is often degraded nowadays to the status of a
nice fairy tale "we" once believed when "we" were just kids.
And consider how difficult it is for us to remember vividly
that we have really been in love with a person we now fear
or despise so much.
But we really have been, you know! And it was true love.
THEN.
Let me try to give an exacter definition of the word truth,
as we commonly use and understand it:
Truth is what both (or more) partners agree to be true
at the very moment of their trustful conversation.
They both (or all) believe that truth. But They are
the only ones to can bear witness to it.
Nobody else can.
Truth has nothing to do, consequently, with a Permanent
Universal Reality that would exist on its own, either we
believe it or not.
Truth has thus nothing to do with Objectivity. With Facts.
And only facts seem to obey to the laws of the contemporary
Science. They can (mostly) be checked by an independent
observer. One can measure them, mathematically analyse,
repeat and predict them.
Do you need to believe something or someone to be sure about
a fact? NO ! You just have to check it by yourself.
Facts can't be true or false. They just ARE there, outside
of us, 'waiting' till the Science begins to explain them. In
other words, till we perceive them and give them a name,
a significance.
And that name IS NOT the fact itself , but the OPINION one
has about this fact (e.g. "the Earth is flat") depending a lot
of the explanation the Science builds around that opinion.
Many scientific theories and axioms have taken, nowadays, the
place of the former religious Authority. You have to agree
with them if you want to build a career at the University or
if you want to be published in a "serious" magazine.
Just as the Churches did in the old days, the 'Academics' teach
the people what they SHOULD now believe about the universe, if
they want to avoid a conflict with the 'spiritual' Authority.
Those scientific dogmas (or paradigms, as they were recently
renamed), are presented to the people as the Truth. And they
ARE really the Truth . for those who BELIEVE in them.
As long, of course, as the present believers won't loose their
'faith' in them. And choose a new scientific Truth to believe
in (also doomed -- of course -- to disappear sooner or later.).
This has always been and will probably ever be the behaviour
of the upper intellectual class.
Why do I insist so heavily upon this point?
Because the Holistic approach of the reality (and of course
of the Medicine) proceeds from an other paradigm (another
belief about what is real) than the paradigm of the majority
of the contemporary scientists.
But I'm sure it has been enough for today. We'll surely talk
again about that big problem. In one of next issues.
Go to Page 1
BIO:
Charles Lebaigue MD is a retired Belgian professor(Medical Psychology)who successfully practised several holistic therapies
Some Aditional Articles you may enjoy
A Startling Fact About Losing Dangerous Belly Fat-- Without Exercise
by David L. KernExercise: Why YOU should do it
by Aaron M. Potts, ISSA CFT, YFTWhat is Thyax? What does it do for Thyroid Problems?
by Jamie RatliffHow to Super Charge Your Diet
by Jason ReischutzThe Health and Fitness Tip: Don’t Be Afraid of Your Fridge
by Ismael D. Tabije
Click a Number to go to an article index page
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39