Mini-Micrografting - Investigating the Pros, the Cons, and the FUE's
by Maggie Kay
Grafts are cut in such a way that individual follicular units may be split up or damaged
Harvesting technique does not ensure that each follicle will be kept intact
Grafts are larger because excess tissue is not trimmed
Healing time is very slow
Follicular Unit Extraction vs. Mini-Micrografting
Most up-to-date hair restoration surgeons recommend that patients choose follicular unit extraction over mini-micrografting because it produces a more natural result, has a faster healing time, and is more efficient in preserving donor hair.
Go to Page 1
BIO:
About the Author - Maggie Kay is a freelance writer from Montreal and is the head researcher and content manager of Hair Transplant Costs - a resourceful site about hair transplant doctors. http://www.hairtransplantcosts.com/
Some Aditional Articles you may enjoy
5 Great Ways to Burn More Fat Today!
by HSF Vitamins"25 Things You Should Do Before You Stop Smoking"
by Joe ArmstrongCan You Reduce Your Risk of Breast Cancer
by Kim BeardsmoreImitation of Life (and How to Get Real)
by Susan Dunn, MA, Emotional Intelligence Coach and ConsultantCan You Attain Weight Loss While Fasting?
by Jason Barger
Click a Number to go to an article index page
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39